MATH U113 · Probability & Statistics · Tutorial companion
Tutorial sheets 1–3: hints, then solutions
Every question from the 5, 12 and 19 Aug tutorial sheets, each mapped to the module section that teaches it, with a hint that names the method and a collapsed full solution. Attempt → hint → solution, in that order.
The course guide calls these sheets the exam's rough draft — they're the only instructor-written problems you have. Working rule: attempt each question for 5 minutes before touching the hint, and open the solution only to check, never to read first. A solution you read is forgotten; a solution you checked your own attempt against sticks. Every number below has been computed independently, not copied.
Coverage so far: T1 = counting + axioms §2.1–2.3, T2 = conditional probability, Bayes, independence + the first pmf §2.4–2.5, §3.2, T3 = pmf, cdf, expectation §3.2–3.3. Nothing on the three sheets goes beyond Modules 1–2.
Tutorial 1 · 05 Aug · counting and the axioms
Prerequisite pages: Module 1 lesson (§3 for the beyond-Devore counting patterns) and notes. Q1–4 and 14 are the patterns the counting drill randomises.
9 flags in a line: 4 white, 3 red, 2 blue, same-colour flags identical. How many signals?
Solution
9! / (4!·3!·2!) = 362880 / 288 = 1260. Equivalent view: choose the 4 white positions, then 3 red from the rest: C(9,4)·C(5,3) = 126·10.
Divide 10 officers into patrol (5), station (2), reserve (3).
Solution
10! / (5!·2!·3!) = C(10,5)·C(5,2)·C(3,3) = 252·10·1 = 2520.
Digits 0–9, n positions (leading zeros allowed — "numbers" here means digit strings). (a) No two consecutive digits equal. (b) 0 appears exactly i times.
Solution
(a) First digit 10 ways; each subsequent digit must avoid its predecessor: 9 ways. 10·9n−1.
(b) Choose the i zero positions in C(n,i) ways; the other n−i positions take any non-zero digit: C(n,i)·9n−i. Sanity: summing over i gives (9+1)n = 10n by the binomial theorem.
4 Americans, 3 French, 3 British in a row, each nationality adjacent.
Solution
3! · 4! · 3! · 3! = 6·24·6·6 = 5184.
Solution
52 weeks guarantee 52 Sundays; a 53rd needs Sunday among the 2 extra days. The pair is (Sun,Mon), (Mon,Tue), …, (Sat,Sun): 7 equally likely, 2 contain Sunday. 2/7. (Non-leap year: 1 extra day → 1/7.)
60% wear neither; 20% ring; 30% necklace.
Solution
(a) P(R ∪ N) = 1 − 0.60 = 0.40. (b) P(R ∩ N) = P(R)+P(N)−P(R∪N) = 0.2+0.3−0.4 = 0.10.
From 1–5 choose one, then another from the remaining four. List outcomes with an odd digit (a) first, (b) second, (c) both times.
Solution
Sample space: 20 ordered pairs (a,b), a ≠ b.
(a) first odd — 3·4 = 12: (1,2)(1,3)(1,4)(1,5)(3,1)(3,2)(3,4)(3,5)(5,1)(5,2)(5,3)(5,4).
(b) second odd — 12: (2,1)(3,1)(4,1)(5,1)(1,3)(2,3)(4,3)(5,3)(1,5)(2,5)(3,5)(4,5).
(c) both odd — 3·2 = 6: (1,3)(1,5)(3,1)(3,5)(5,1)(5,3).
Solution
24 + 61 − 11 = 74%.
6 computers, 2 laptops; 2 chosen at random (15 outcomes).
Solution
(a) both laptops: C(2,2)/15 = 1/15. (b) both desktops: C(4,2)/15 = 6/15 = 0.4. (c) at least one desktop = 1 − (a) = 14/15. (d) one of each: 2·4/15 = 8/15. Check: 1/15 + 6/15 + 8/15 = 1.
Solution
(a) 1 − 0.526 = 0.474. (b) 1 − 0.239 − 0.03 = 0.731 (the two "all same" events are disjoint, so they add).
Independent, P(A) > P(B), P(A∪B)=0.626, P(A∩B)=0.144. Find both.
Solution
Sum: P(A)+P(B) = P(A∪B)+P(A∩B) = 0.770. Product: P(A)P(B) = 0.144. So they solve t² − 0.77t + 0.144 = 0: discriminant 0.5929 − 0.576 = 0.0169 = 0.13², roots (0.77 ± 0.13)/2. P(A) = 0.45, P(B) = 0.32.
6 withdrawal + 4 substitution forms; 6 given away at random. P(only one type remains on the desk)?
Solution
Leave 4 W: give 2 W + 4 S → C(6,2)·C(4,4) = 15. Leave 4 S: give 6 W → C(6,6) = 1. Total C(10,6) = 210. 16/210 = 8/105 ≈ 0.076.
P(A)=0.5, P(B)=0.4, P(A∩B)=0.25.
Solution
(a) "one of the two sports" — read as at least one: 0.5+0.4−0.25 = 0.65. (If your tutor meant exactly one: 0.65 − 0.25 = 0.40 — ask which; both are one line once the Venn is filled.) (b) none: 0.35. (c) both: 0.25.
Solution
(a) Position pairs (i, i+5) for i = 1…6: 6 pairs × 2 orders × 9! for the rest, over 11!: 12·9!/11! = 12/110 = 6/55 ≈ 0.109.
(b) Total arrangements 11!/(4!·4!·2!) = 34650. With SSSS glued: 8 items (block, I×4, P×2, M) → 8!/(4!·2!) = 840. 840/34650 = 4/165 ≈ 0.024.
P(A)=P(B)=½, P(Ac∩Bc)=⅓.
Solution
P(A∪B) = 1 − ⅓ = ⅔, so P(A∩B) = ½+½−⅔ = ⅓. Then P(A∩Bc) = ½ − ⅓ = ⅙, and P(A∪Bc) = P(A)+P(Bc)−P(A∩Bc) = ½+½−⅙ = 5/6.
3 production, 4 purchase, 2 sales, 1 CA. Committee of 4.
Solution
(a) 3·4·2·1/210 = 24/210 = 4/35. (b) 1 − C(6,4)/210 = 1 − 15/210 = 13/14. (c) C(9,3)/210 = 84/210 = 2/5.
Tutorial 2 · 12 Aug · conditional probability, Bayes, first pmf
Prerequisite pages: Module 1 lesson (conditional probability, the two-stage tree, Bayes) and Module 2 lesson for Q7.
Solution
(a) P(line 1) = 500/1500 = 1/3. Crack counts: 0.50·500 + 0.44·400 + 0.40·600 = 250+176+240 = 666, so P(crack) = 0.444.
(b) P(blemish | line 1) = 0.15 — read straight from the table.
(c) Surface-defect counts: 50 + 32 + 90 = 172; P(line 1 | surface) = 50/172 = 0.291. This is Bayes done with counts — no formula needed.
Solution
(a) P(pass) = 0.95 + 0.05·0.8·0.6 = 0.95 + 0.024 = 0.974. (b) P(initial pass | pass) = 0.95/0.974 = 0.975.
P(B)=0.9, P(A∪B)=0.96, P(A∩B)=0.75. Find P(B|A).
Solution
P(A) = 0.96 + 0.75 − 0.90 = 0.81; P(B|A) = 0.75/0.81 = 0.926.
Solution
Pairwise: P(A₁∩A₂) = 0.12+0.07−0.13 = 0.06, P(A₁∩A₃) = 0.03, P(A₂∩A₃) = 0.02; centre 0.01.
Venn regions: only-1 = 0.12−0.06−0.03+0.01 = 0.04; only-2 = 0.07−0.06−0.02+0.01 = 0; only-3 = 0.05−0.03−0.02+0.01 = 0.01; 1&2 only 0.05; 1&3 only 0.02; 2&3 only 0.01; all three 0.01. Union = 0.14.
(a) 0.88 (b) 0.06 (c) 0.05 (d) 1 − P(all three) = 0.99 (e) 0.06/0.12 = 0.5 (f) 0.01/0.12 = 0.083 (g) exactly one = 0.04+0+0.01 = 0.05, over the union: 0.05/0.14 = 0.357 (h) 0.05/0.06 = 0.833.
Stuck? This question from zero — the prior/likelihood/posterior vocabulary, the eight-sequence figure, the tree and the area picture, and what each possible number of detections would have told the engineer.
Solution
Present: C(3,2)·0.8²·0.2 = 0.384. Absent: C(3,2)·0.1²·0.9 = 0.027.
P(present | data) = 0.4·0.3840.4·0.384 + 0.6·0.027 = 0.15360.1698 = 0.905
Stuck? This question from zero — why the complement, the two views of "all different" (counting and the chain of fractions), the running-product table, a slider-and-simulation widget for part (b), and the "shares my birthday" trap.
Solution
(a) P(all different) = (365·364·…·356)/365¹⁰ = 0.883; at least two share: 0.117.
(b) Running the product: k = 22 gives 0.476, k = 23 gives 0.507. k = 23.
Solution
(a) k(1+2+3+4+5) = 1 ⇒ k = 1/15, so p(y) = y/15, y = 1…5. (b) P(Y ≤ 3) = 6/15 = 0.4. (c) P(2 ≤ Y ≤ 4) = 9/15 = 0.6.
(d) With p(y) = ky²: 1+4+9+16+25 = 55, so p(y) = y²/55; P(Y ≤ 3) = 14/55 ≈ 0.255; P(2 ≤ Y ≤ 4) = 29/55 ≈ 0.527.
Tutorial 3 · 19 Aug · pmf, cdf, expectation
Prerequisite pages: Module 2 lesson and notes (§3.2–3.3).
Solution
(a) P(Y ≤ 50) = 0.05+0.10+0.12+0.14+0.25+0.17 = 0.83. (b) P(Y ≥ 51) = 0.17. (c) First standby needs Y ≤ 49: 0.66. Third standby needs Y ≤ 47: 0.27.
Solution
Counts (over 35): w = 6:1, 7:1, 8:2, 9:3, 10:4, 11:4, 12:5, 13:4, 14:4, 15:3, 16:2, 17:1, 18:1. So p(w) = count/35.
μ = 12 (symmetry; also 3 × average card 4). E(W²) = Σ w²·count/35 = 5320/35 = 152, so σ² = 152 − 144 = 8.
Solution
(b) F(m) = P(both ≤ m) = m²/36 for m = 1…6 (a step function: 0 below 1, 1 at and above 6).
(a) p(m) = F(m) − F(m−1) = (2m−1)/36: 1/36, 3/36, 5/36, 7/36, 9/36, 11/36. Sums to 36/36.
Solution
n = 3: E[min(X,3)] = (1·1 + 2·2 + 3·12)/15 = 41/15; profit 4·41/15 − 6 = $4.93.
n = 4: E[min(X,4)] = (1 + 4 + 9 + 4·9)/15 = 50/15; profit 4·50/15 − 8 = $5.33. Order four.
Previous-year quizzes
Papers from earlier years surface through seniors — as new ones land, they get added here. Read them chiefly for format: what a 20-minute, answer-only paper feels like is the one thing the tutorial sheets can't teach. But a different year can mean a different paper-setter and different emphasis — treat each entry as a style guide, not a contract.
Quiz · 2026–27 (09 Sep 2026) · the paper she sat
Four variants and the key are filed; every question is rebuilt from zero on the quiz post-mortem page — Bayes with n unknown (urns), a conditional with a union in the condition, and the shuffled-PINs matching problem (derangements). Same format as below: 30 min, 20 marks, five decimals, no partial credit.
Quiz 1 · 2025–26 (05 Feb 2026) · conditional probability + expectation
Want these rebuilt from first principles instead of compressed? The two quiz questions, from zero — every step shown, with figures and all four variants. Two questions, 10 marks each, with about four numeric variants of the same paper across the room (same structure, shuffled numbers — so memorised answers are worthless, methods aren't). For reference while you prepare: this year's Quiz 1 is most probably 09 Sep — class word, unconfirmed; check LMS.
| Duration | Marks | Type | Answer format | Partial credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 min | 20 | Closed book | Fill in the blank — final answer only, rounded to five decimal places | None — rough work is not evaluated, and overwriting voids the answer |
A correct method with an arithmetic slip scores zero here — so the skill under test is fluency plus accuracy under time. Three habits worth drilling: sanity-check that every probability lands in [0, 1] before writing it; know the rounding convention cold (variant B's Bayes answer is 0.471803… → write 0.47180, trailing zero included — five decimals means five digits); and do the arithmetic in rough space, check it once, then write in the blank a single time.
A box holds coins C₁ and C₂; P(choose C₁) = 0.4. C₁ shows heads with probability 0.4 per toss, C₂ with 0.7. One coin is chosen at random and tossed 5 times. (i) P(at least 3 heads | C₁ chosen)? (ii) P(the coin was C₂ | exactly 3 heads observed)?
Solution
(i) Given C₁, heads-count ~ binomial(n = 5, p = 0.4). Add the top three terms, using C(5,3) = 10, C(5,4) = 5, C(5,5) = 1:
P(≥3) = 10(0.4)³(0.6)² + 5(0.4)⁴(0.6) + (0.4)⁵ = 0.2304 + 0.0768 + 0.01024 = 0.31744.
(ii) Two ways the evidence "exactly 3 heads" can happen — through C₁ or through C₂ — and Bayes is the C₂ branch over their sum. Each branch = P(that coin) × P(3 heads with it):
C₂ branch: 0.6 × 10(0.7)³(0.3)² = 0.6 × 0.30870 = 0.18522. C₁ branch: 0.4 × 10(0.4)³(0.6)² = 0.4 × 0.23040 = 0.09216.
P(C₂ | 3H) = 0.18522 / (0.18522 + 0.09216) = 0.18522/0.27738 = 0.66775. Same shape as T2 Q5 — the companion flagged that pattern as one to master, and here it is worth 5 marks.
X = number of heads in two fair tosses. (i) E[(X + 1)²]? (ii) If V[aX² + 1] = 2.25, find the positive a.
Solution
The pmf, by counting the four equally likely toss-pairs (the same build-from-outcomes routine as the dice-grid walkthrough): p(0) = ¼, p(1) = ½, p(2) = ¼.
(i) Term by term: E[(X+1)²] = ¼·1² + ½·2² + ¼·3² = 0.25 + 2 + 2.25 = 4.5. (Cross-check by expanding: E[X²] + 2E[X] + 1 = 1.5 + 2 + 1 = 4.5 ✓.)
(ii) V[aX² + 1] = a²V[X²] (the +1 shifts, doesn't spread; the a comes out squared). Now V[X²] = E[X⁴] − (E[X²])² with E[X²] = ¼·0 + ½·1 + ¼·4 = 1.5 and E[X⁴] = ¼·0 + ½·1 + ¼·16 = 4.5, so V[X²] = 4.5 − 2.25 = 2.25. Then a² · 2.25 = 2.25 ⇒ a = 1.
The one new tool: E[X⁴] — a fourth moment. Nothing deeper than E[X²]: the same term-by-term sum with fourth powers. It's the only place this quiz stepped past what T3 drilled, and one deliberate rep closes it.
All four variants, answered (recomputed and checked against the circulated answer key). Note the pattern: p₂ = 0.7 in every set, and Q1(i) depends only on p₁ — the "P(choose C₁)" number is a decoy for part (i).
| Variant (P(C₁), p₁) | Q1(i) | Q1(ii) | Q2(i) asks | Q2(i) | Q2(ii) target | a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (0.4, 0.4) | 0.31744 | 0.66775 | E[(X+1)²] | 4.5 | 2.25 | 1 |
| (0.6, 0.4) | 0.31744 | 0.47180 | E[(X−1)²] | 0.5 | 9 | 2 |
| (0.4, 0.6) | 0.68256 | 0.57262 | E[(X+2)²] | 9.5 | 20.25 | 3 |
| (0.6, 0.6) | 0.68256 | 0.37323 | E[(X−2)²] | 1.5 | 36 | 4 |
Where each question maps onto this year's sheets:
| Quiz question | This year's tutorial pattern |
|---|---|
| Q1(i) binomial tail, coin given | T2's binomial setups (§3.4 machinery) |
| Q1(ii) Bayes, binomial likelihoods | T2 Q5 — the exact pattern, third of Bayes's three forms |
| Q2 E and V of functions of X | T3 Q4 E[h(X)] term by term + the pmf-from-outcomes build |
The takeaway: last year's quiz was this year's tutorial patterns in fill-in-the-blank clothing. So prepare with the same material — but timed and to five decimals: the practice drill in short, clock-on bursts is the closest rehearsal available.
What the three sheets tell you
T1 is mostly Ross-style counting, not Devore. Five of sixteen questions (1, 2, 4, 12, 14) use identical-copies / labelled-groups / glue patterns that Devore §2.3 never names. They're in the Module 1 lesson §3 and the drill — that's the one place the sheets run ahead of the textbook.
T2 is pure Devore §2.4–2.5. The method that appears three times (Q1c, Q2b, Q5) is Bayes — as counts, as a tree, and with a binomial likelihood. Master all three forms.
T3 is short and entirely §3.2–3.3 — but Q4 is the exam-style trap: expected profit needs E[h(X)] term by term. Q2 signals enumerate-a-pmf questions will be asked even when tedious; symmetry shortcuts are your friend.
T1 Q13(a), "one of the two" — ambiguous between "at least one" and "exactly one". Write which reading you took. T2 Q4 — guessing P(A₁∩A₂) instead of deriving it from the union. T3 Q4 — plugging E[X] = 3.67 into the profit formula instead of computing E[profit] term by term.
Paste a question and say: "Don't solve it. Tell me which Devore section it maps to and name the first step." Then: "I got ___ — check my reasoning, not just the number." Avoid "solve Tutorial 2 Q5" — you'll read a solution and retain nothing.